Project Premortem

“A project is complete when it starts working for you, rather than you working for it.”

We are proud to introduce this new section @ e-power focused on Project Management.

Today, our work, short or long term in every area is better viewed as a part of some Project rather than just a ‘job’. Personal and professional goals too, are better seen and planned as Projects, otherwise they are just wish lists.

The art and science of effective project planning, management and execution is critical to an individual’s success. This section will focus on sharing some out-of the box, unconventional but practical ideas on project management. We hope our efforts will help you to plan, manage and execute projects better.

Project Premortem 

Typically, people spend huge amount of time and efforts to analyse the cause of failure, after the project execution. In premortem, people brainstorm by imagining different factors for project failure, before the project launch.

A research conducted in 1989 by Deborah J. Mitchell, of the Wharton School; Jay Russo, of Cornell; and Nancy Pennington, of the University of Colorado, found that prospective hindsightimagining that an event has already occurred helps to improve the ability to correctly identify future outcomes by almost 30%.

Premortem helps to improve the ability to see-through the risks, slip-ups in planning beforehand and can drastically reduce the probability of project failure.

Premortem Advantage 

Often project planning is done by a small team of experienced professionals. This team has a somewhat detached view of the project. The plan is then communicated to people who are expected to implement the project. The plan could be highly exhaustive and excellent. But because people implementing the project did not get an opportunity to participate in developing the plan, there is a tendency to not own the project plan.

Premortem brainstorming in projects solves this problem in two ways. One, it enables all the teams to participate in the process of project planning. The discussions will be extremely helpful in critical assessment of the plan from all aspects.Two, it facilitates a precious analysis of reasons of project failure without actually carrying the burden of failure.

Conducting Premortem 

Gather the team and explain the concept of premortem to every team member. Communicate the objectives and rules for the discussion. (Rules could be about imagining scenarios that are practical etc.). Allocate about 1-2 hrs depending on size and complexity of the project. While it is advisable to include as many team members as possible, limiting the number below 20 is advisable for fruitful analysis.

Start by announcing the failure of the project. Get everyone to imagine that they are in future. This could be achieved by simple gestures like putting a future date on the whiteboard in the room etc.

Ask different teams and each member within the team to make a list of all possible, but practical reasons why they think the project failed. Get teams to make their list exhaustive overall but the individual points should be exclusive of each other.

Conduct a brainstorming discussion on how the most dominant reasons for failures could have been avoided. The discussion will bring everyone on the same page with regards to reasons for failure and thus channelize energy to think solutions that will help to complete project in time. This also helps to identify ‘soft’ issues related to miscommunication, trust deficit or any pre-conceived notions formed due to past experience within the teams/ departments.

Create a cross-functional team to update the initial project plan. Incorporate steps to mitigate the risks with respect to reasons for project failure identified during the discussion.

Premortem incentivizing dissent and immediately exposes the practical risks in project plan. The process of project premortem is also found to improve the commitment of teams responsible for project execution while also improving upon the objectivity in post-project analysis.

Links to a few other articles, on the same topic, that you may find interesting to read:

 

Posted in Project Management | Leave a comment

Separate Green from the Greener…

These days it has become quite fashionable to ‘be /go / buy green’.

Most companies have launched programs to build a green element in their products. Mostly, it is about energy use or efficiency.

‘Green’ has also become a buzzword in marketing.

There are two types of companies today – ones that have a genuine intent and passion for building ‘Green’ products and those that use ‘Green’ only as a marketing gimmick. In future, we can expect almost every company claiming their product to be green in some or the other way. With huge ambiguity in the claims to be Green, it is really difficult to assess the products.

 

Also, there is an urgent need to look beyond the obvious. That is considering other factors in addition to energy efficiency while comparing two green products or technologies.

In this newsletter we discuss a simple framework and parameters that could be used while comparing green products with each other.

Hope this will help you to separate the green from greener and the later from the greenest.

Product Operation

  • Energy efficiency is most widely used as parameter as of now. With rising energy prices this is bound to remain as a dominant parameter even in future. Add-ons available to further improve energy efficiency will always be an advantage.
  • Check if the maintenance requires any special treatment involving material hazardous for environment. Avoid products with short life cycles, unless they are made from renewable material.
  • Check for any by-products or pollutants produced during operations that could be harmful to the environment.

Manufacturing Process

  • Consider the difference between manufacturing processes. Check for energy intensiveness of the manufacturing process. Avoid products with high energy consuming manufacturing processes.
  • Look for any waste material or hazardous by-products produced during the manufacturing process.

 

Raw Materials

  • Use of renewable raw material in products is always an advantage. Use of material with rare or scarce availability in nature will earn a low rating on the green scale.
  • The processes used in extraction of raw materials, its handling, storage and transportation and its Impact on the environment should be considered.

Disposal and Recycle

  • Ease, safety and costs of an environmental friendly disposal are key considerations.
  • Scope for recycling the product or material used in the product is also an important factor.

A broader canvas of analysis, with most, if not all, the parameters above is necessary for an exhaustive assessment of green products. While it could be difficult to get information on some of the parameters during the purchase process, thinking beyond just the energy efficiency is a must to ensure green future.

 

 

Posted in GreenCabinet@e-power, Opinion | Leave a comment

Monsoon Gateways Near Pune

We have a love and hate relationship with the rains. While we think of problems like traffic jams, water logging and power cuts in rains, all this evaporates with the smell of the earth soaking in the first raindrops.

In the last monsoons, we discussed technical issues like maintenance of your electrical systems etc. in e-power.
This monsoons, we bring to you, couple of cool places that are a ‘must visit’ during rainy season. So step out, enjoy the rains and get refreshed.

Zenith Waterfall

This place has gained lot of appreciation and popularity in the last 2-3 years. The main attraction is over 500 ft. deep, seasonal waterfall. One has to trek for about 2 kms through the stream of water flowing down the mountain to reach the waterfall. The feel of forceful, roaring waterfall is unforgettable.

The place is about an hours drive from Khopoli near Mumbai.

 Zenith Waterfall – View Detail Map

 Watch the Video

The place does not have many eateries around and may be crowded on the weekends.

Koraigad

First few showers of the monsoons wraps this five century old fort in lush green grass and trees. The trek is light with the best part being a walk on the fortification walls. The view down the hill is simply mesmerizing. Watching the rain clouds gliding through the fort is experiencing nature at it’s best.

With abundance of tiny waterfalls on the way up to the fort and a scenic view of backwaters of Mulshi dam, Koraigad is an ideal gateway to free-up body and soul. A steaming hot cup of tea or a glimpse of a rainbow (if you are lucky) just adds to the bliss.

Koraigad – View Detail Map

Kunda Mala

Kunda Mala, literally means a string of ponds. Kunda Mala is still a relatively unknown paradise. It has numerous ponds around the entire stretch which get filled during the rains.  Hidden in the interiors of Talegaon, this place is ideal for a Saturday afternoon in heavy rains.  Take a dip or just sit along the water gushing through the rocky terrain, visiting Kunda Mala is an ideal  family weekend gateway.

Kundmala is around 10 kms from Dehu. Cadbury India factory at Induri in Talegao is one of the landmarks.

Kund Mala – View Detail Map

Nighoj – the natural water park

Nighoj is a small sleepy village near Shirur (70 Km from Pune). The river Kukadi flows near the village temple forming deep canyons. The canyons have created deep and beautiful chain of potholes. In summer, the river level goes down and one can see a chain of small ponds. Towards end of monsoons or early winter the whole canyon looks like a series of miniature waterfalls.

To reach Nighoj take a left after Ghodnadi at Shirur.

Nighoj – Veiw Detail Map

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Jaitapur – Ticking Bomb or Panacea to Power Problems

The previous newsletter highlighted views on various paradigms of developments in context of the Jaitapur agitation. In this newsletter we discuss the broader canvas on which the Jaitapur nuclear power plant project should be assessed.

It is difficult to allay the fear of nuclear technology failing under catastrophic situations like earthquakes or recent tsunami at Fakushima. But the only way to allay those fears seems to be to take the risks and develop safer technology.

 

Jaitapur: Ticking Bomb OR Panacea to Power Problems (Download Report)

Views For Jaitapur

Views Against Jaitapur

Common Sense and Nuclear Technology V/s Coal Based Power

Praful Bidwai Against Use of Nuclear Technology

Seth Godin, a marketing guru brings a very unusual perspective to the whole issue of risks in nuclear technology. On one of his blog he writes “Do you have an opinion about nuclear power? About the relative safety of one form of power over another? How did you come to this opinion? Here are the stats, A non-exaggerated but simple version of the data: For every person killed by nuclear power generation, 4,000 die due to coal, adjusted for the same amount of power produced… Praful Bidwai in one of his articles mentions Jaitapur reactors will release 52 billion litres of water daily into the sea at a temperature 5 °C hotter than the sea. Construction of the project and transmission systems will inevitably damage this unique ecosystem, including its flourishing agriculture, fruit cultivation (crowned by the alphonso, the world’s best-known mango), and fisheries, thereby devastating 40,000 livelihoods. Further he adds that, Data collected by the Geological Survey of India has suggested that there have been over 92 quakes in 20 years, the biggest of them being 6.2 on the Richter scale.

Sharad Pawar On Nuclear Energy and Catostraphic Fears

Vivek Monterio – Konkan Bachao Samiti

On avoiding the Fear of catastrophe while adopting nuclear technology Sharad Pawar says, “One has to see how to overcome natural calamities. It is wrong to stop forces of development. We have not stopped construction of houses because of earthquakes. Lakhs of homes were destroyed in Latur earthquake. We rebuilt many more.” “All along experts had tried to convince us that Chernobyl was just an exception. Now, with what has happened in Japan nobody can say that nuclear power is safe and clean. We have not raised new questions. But the truth is that the questions we raised were ignored. What has happened in Japan has only increased the determination of the people to oppose the Jaitapur project. People across the board will now be asking questions about safety.”

 

 Beyond Jaitapur…..

Issues like Jaitapur highlight the void in the Indian democratic system. In the time to come we not only have to solve the challenge thrown up at Jaitapur but also prepare ourselves for developmental challenges that could be larger and more complex than Jaitapur.

As a long term solution we need a system that enables participation of people in choosing their developmental paradigm. As technocrats, our role will be to improve the awareness of science and technology related issues in the society. Above all, as opposed to violent agitations or court cases stretching over decades we need to develop a faster and mature mechanism to arrive at consensus.

Let us hope and work to arrive at a win-win situation for all the stakeholders involved in Jaitapur nuclear power plant, at the earliest.

 

Posted in Design@e-power, Opinion | Leave a comment

Jaitapur, Development, Agitation and Us

The agitation for Jaitapur nuclear power plant project is intensifying. People, environmentalists, NGOs on one side are fighting it out with the Government, Industry and scientific fraternity.

As professionals in the electrical industry and responsible citizens we have the ability to bring a unique perspective of the whole issue. We represent a unique group. While some of us would rank as top producers of electricity others could be the largest consumers. We will have to choose our side, sooner or later. Being ignorant or indifferent can be costly.

But what side do we take? 

It is a tough choice….

Less power cuts for us v/s Destroyed livelihood for people of Madban
Disturb the economic growth v/s Disturb the delicate ecosystem
Confidence in nuclear technology v/s Solar, Wind, Coal or Gas based power
Believe our scientists v/s Go by the accidents at nuclear power plants

The complexity of issues like Jaitapur stems from the large number of viewpoints that we need to assess in our opinion making process.  Play of Politics, paisa, and power further adds to this complexity.

The objective of this newsletter is NOT to preach or point to a solution but to assist in shaping your opinion. The two part newsletter is an intelligent and exhaustive compilation of the most relevant but at times totally opposite viewpoints related Jaitapur.  Compilation of relevant viewpoints in a single snapshot will help you to easily understand and compare different views at the same time.

Compilation of these views, built through a research of over hundred news, editorial articles and reports, is our sincere effort to get a step closer in shaping your opinion.

It is a complex issue and finding a common ground between opposing views is the only way to achieve a consensus and develop sustainable solution.

Jaitapur: Ticking Bomb OR Panacea to Power Problems (Download Report)

Development v/s Development

Usually, opposing large projects like Jaitapur is viewed as opposing development. But the fight here is not between development and no development but the difference in developmental paradigms.  

Views For Jaitapur

Views Against Jaitapur

Dr. Kakodkar stresses the need for nuclear energy in India

Dr. Madhav Gadgil’s  Interim Report Argument

“There is no doubt that we have to give importance to solar energy, but we cannot get it 24 hours. And, storing it on a large scale is not economically viable. For today’s needs, we have to use all the energy resources [oil, fossil fuels, wind, solar], but for the future, nuclear and solar are the only two options” The Western Ghats Ecology Expert Committee report questions the very logic of setting up a number of power projects in konkan area. The energy requirement of Konkan area is 180 MW, while their current ­production is 4,543 MW, so the area is producing vastly more than its own needs.

Dr SH Pawar, well-known physicist

Why I oppose Jaitapur? – Milind Thatte

But the fact remains that even hydro and thermal power stations would have been affected if an earthquake of such a magnitude had struck. I will still insist that nuclear power is the best option even after what happened in Japan. Taking clues from the report, Milind Thatte, an activist working in tribal region of Nasik suggests on his blog to shift the production centers close to consumption centers. By that logic the power plants, he says, should be in Malabar hill or Nariman point and not Ratnagiri.

 

Jaitapur – Maharashtra’s Singur? – Kajay Iyer

Tehelka Article on Jaitapur Issue

The Jaitapur issue is not one of environment or even livelihood. It is more about communication and utter mistrust of the government. And the government needs to come down to the level of the villagers and talk to them in their language if it ever wants to achieve the targets of the project. Japan couldn’t have come at a worse time for this project and the nation’s track record with safety is not much to boast of, even if nuclear sites in the country have been largely safe. Too often, power projects are sanctioned in the name of the poor but the power generated never reaches them. Land is seized unfairly; the compensation is insufficient; environmental impact assessments are fudged; health hazards are not mitigated; the best technology is not used; honest cost benefit analyses are not done; and the access to benefits is unfairly skewed. At the core of India’s energy riddle then is the absence of best practices: the absence of trust.

In the next newsletter we take a look at the larger canvas of nuclear energy in India and other nuclear powers across the world.

 

Posted in Opinion | Leave a comment

How are you managing Power Quality?

“We believe that electricity exists, because the electric company keeps sending us bills for it, but we often forget to look at how it travels inside wires.”

While the electricity consumption is meticulously monitored in industries efforts to improve the power quality often takes a backseat. We had discussed about definition and disturbances affecting power quality in one of our previous newsletters Understanding Power Quality . The response prompted us to further probe into the issues related to power quality.

In this newsletter we highlight two important pointers to help improve power quality, almost immediately.

Time to have a ‘Power Quality Expert’

Managing “Power Quality” involves multiple tasks across various levels. Typically, organizations have departmentalized roles and responsibilities. Departmentalized structure in organization, makes it difficult to take up tasks such as managing power quality that require a lot of interdepartmental coordination. Understanding, managing and improving power quality thus needs an integrated, multi-disciplinary approach.

While most professionals would agree on power quality being an important element, very few actually have a person or team whose core job is to improve Power Quality. Power Quality is discussed only from crisis to crisis, attracting little or no attention in between.

Clearly, there is a need to make “Power Quality” someone’s core responsibility. It may not be a full time job, but it is absolutely necessary to have a dedicated resource focused on the task to improve power quality.

External agencies with multi-disciplinary expertise can be employed to monitor and improve power quality and ensure good health for all electrical equipments.

Invest in smart data capture

To assess power quality issues is, in many ways, similar to annual all body checkup by doctor.

In a annual body checkup, the doctor looks at the data and tries to find out the symptoms which are yet to surface as problems. This helps to proactively identify health related issues and gives us enough time to work towards solving them.

Similarly, regular check-ups by a Power Quality Expert helps to proactively identify issues related to health of electrical equipments. The Expert studies the data patterns from electrical systems to identify abnormal behavior. These abnormal data patterns are further studied to understand underlying problems and steps required to eliminate the same.

The conditions in which electrical equipments operate vary from industry to industry. The definition of abnormal conditions for electrical system/ equipments may change depending on the working conditions. Hence there is a need for deep practical understanding of underlying products, systems and working dynamics while doing power quality analysis.

In many cases today, the electrical data that can actually reveal the power quality problems is not measured at all. Furthermore, with conventional manual entry systems it’s relatively difficult to look at the data patterns and establish co-relations. Advanced analysis of data patterns to identify Power Quality related issues is almost impossible. Use of simple yet effective automated data collection software is highly recommended in this context.

Posted in Maintenance@e-power, Saftey | Leave a comment

Expert Interview: Ekta Sanghvi on Art and Science of Lighting

In this issue of e-power we speak to Mrs. Ekta Sanghvi, Principal, Lighting Concepts – a leading consulting firm that advising clients on all aspects of Lighting.

After completing her formal education in Electronics Engineering and Lighting, Ekta went for Design Certification from US and Germany. She assisted a few international lighting designers before founding Lighting Concepts, a firm focused on end to end advisory services in Lighting since 2004 based in Pune. Lighting Concepts also has LEED Consultants on board.

Ekta is an active member of IESNA  (Illuminating Engineering Society of North America). A few of her landmark project include the EON Freezone IT Park at Kharadi, Bharat Diamond Bourse in Mumbai and several high end residences across various Indian Cities. Presently she is associated with several leading Architects and Interior Designers for various projects in India as well as global markets.

LightScaping : Interesting Effects in Lighting – Download Presentation

What is your role as a lighting consultant?

Lighting is the most important dimension of architecture in addition to interior, exterior and civil. In conceptualizing, just like an architect creates a storyboard, we create lighting design boards. As a consultant we take ownership or end to end responsibility from conceptualization lighting theme with detail lighting design in Autocad including the layouts, looping layouts, budgeting, scheduling, fixture and light selection to installation assistance.

In lighting conceptualization we address to visual hierarchy, intensity levels, contrast engineering, light distribution, and any other specific requirements pertaining to ambience, creating focal points in interiors and exteriors.

Next we do integration with Building Management Systems. More importantly, we co-ordinate with Security people and ensure adequate light for clear visibility in areas monitored through CCTVs. Post execution, we again cross-verify if everything is done according to specification. We supervise in mounting, aiming and focusing of lights to achieve desired impact.

The project handover includes maintenance schedule or guide specifying the type of lamps used (luminaire, make, code etc.) maintenance and replacement procedures. This is applicable for lighting fixtures too, which may not be readily available. Most of the times, we have to be the last ones to handover our work to client.

What value do you bring to the project?

The value that we bring to the project is unique and specific to that project. For example, I would like to share our work in case of street lights. Now there is a urgent need to improve efficiency and effectiveness of Street lights. So we are working with the Muncipal Corporation to help them achieve about 80% savings in current energy consumption of street lights.

Today, the street lights consist of 2 X 250W bulbs. The distance between two street lights is twice the height of the street light pole. With improved design which intelligently uses reflectors and optics, we can use bulbs of just 2 X 70W and the distance between two poles can be extended to 4-5 times of the height of the pole. For this particular project our work not only brings in a huge savings in the power consumed but also helps save on capital expenditure for street lights.

How do you rate the current scenario of using expert help for lighting in the market?

Well, the awareness about lighting design was still low until recently. About six years ago, clients use to misunderstand us as a trader. Today, the situation is much better. There is greater awareness about the kind of ‘value’ that a lighting consultant brings to the project. People have seen, experienced our work, realized the benefits and that has got the ball rolling. So today, most of our business comes from referrals.

I believe the large companies that provide lighting products would also be providing consulting services?

Yes. The consulting services are essentially limited to advice on their range of products. But then in these cases the limitation of the product becomes the limitation of the project. That comes very differently with us. If I were to draw out the most important proposition that we bring to any project – it is unbiased advice where the requirements of the project comes first. In terms of brand or fixtures we have a whole palette around the world. Being an independent consultant allows us to be able to pick and choose the best of the available solutions, products and technologies in lighting.

What are the common/ typical mistakes in lighting?

Most common mistakes like, when in an interior downlights fixture where you have more than one CFL and when replace either usually there is a different color within the same fixture. This happens purely when there is a change in the color of lamp and then we complain.

I will not term it is as a mistake, but there is a tendency to pick up and use the latest thing available in the market without complete knowledge of the subject. For example, lately you will see that lot of people are using LED lighting. Often the reason sighted is energy savings. But what most don’t realize is that just the use of LEDs doesn’t mean you are saving on energy. In fact, in many cases CFL is more appropriate option both in terms of cost, energy savings and quality of illumination.

It is important to understand the application of LEDs. No doubt they are better in saving energy, but they are suitable for only certain type of applications. LED is increasingly being used for general illumination too. I would say LED technology per se is not yet ready for application in general illumination.

There are lots of technical issues that currently limit the use of LEDs in general illumination. Since LEDs are a point source of light, direct view of LEDs for a long time is harmful to your eyes mostly due to glare issues.  We still don’t have standard rules of use established for LEDs like we have for other lamp sources.

How do you see the problems in lighting in workshop, factories where some manufacturing activities are being carried out.

Lighting has to be configured depending on factory type and the type of work. For example if you are doing fine work you need more light and visibility. So the use of only skylight or high-bay light may not be enough. Bad lighting will affect both health of the person and production quality. Illumination levels in factories are one area that gets scarce attention. It becomes even more critical in places where hazardous chemicals, acids etc. are used in production process.

What are immediate and urgent areas of improvements in closed temperature controlled environments?

An important area of improvement is the layout of lights. Typically, one will see cluster of two or four lights put in one line running above the cubicles. Now this is easy for maintenance but a extremly poor design when we consider working conditions and energy consumption. Use of target or task oriented lighting can help in saving energy, but is often pushed aside citing higher capital expenditure.

For many of the companies, today, employees work late into the night. This affects the Circadian cycle of employees, which in turn leads to loss of sleep and other health problems. Proper lighting can be very useful minimizing the health related problems due to all night shifts or working late into the night.

How are we placed vis a vis the developed world in terms of lighting?

We in India are a lagging a step behind. For example, use of T2, T3 type tubelight is prevalent in the developed world. In India we still use T5 type of light.

What are the future trends in terms of technology in lighting?

There are organic LEDs on the horizon. We can say there are the next generation of current LED lights. Then there are phosphorus sheets, which are as thin as a paper and are likely to find commercial application in lighting.

In terms of overall nature of technology evolution, I think over the next one or two decades we will get to see huge variants of lights being developed and used for extremely specific purpose. So the field as a whole will be very specialized and the co-relation between technology and application or utility will be tighter. For example, the phosphorous sheet lighting probably has no or limited application in general lighting but has great utility for some specific application.

Other dominant theme, we all know is energy savings. So we are more likely to see cheaper versions of far more energy efficient lighting in near future.

To conclude, I would say we will have an ever expanding choice of technology and ever increasing choice of variants for each technology. Typically, today for any project we evaluate over 200 different types of lamps with huge number of variants in each type. As this figure grows the real challenge will be pick and choose the right type of lighting for your application. Ultimately, Lighting is a combination of both Art and Science. And as consultant we have to keep the focus to bring in both in our work.

Posted in Experts@e-power, GreenCabinet@e-power | Leave a comment

A Brief History of Electric Lamp……

“Edison failed 10,000 times before he made the electric light bulb. Do not be discouraged if you fail a few times.”

The struggle and story behind invention of electric light bulb by Edison, we all know, is fascinating. Equally fascinating is the change that the electric bulb has got to our lives. In fact, this is one invention that has enabled and empowered the beginning of thousand others.

While the Light bulb has profoundly changed our lives, the bulb itself has been changing since it was invented about  in 1890. Many of Edison’s inventions continue to be in use even today without significant change in their core technology. In case of electrical lamps too, the hundred year old invention with tungsten carbide filament in bulbs still rules the market.

In this newsletter, we have created an infographic to showcase the evolution of the Electric Lamp since its invention. Interestingly, like the processing power of computational devices the life of electric lamps too is doubling every couple of years as they get more energy efficient.

“When Thomas Edison worked late into the night on the electric light, he had to do it by gas lamp or candle. I’m sure it made the work seem that much more urgent.” said George Carlin an American Comedian. Similarly, but on a serious note, we hope that the intensifying energy crisis will open our eyes to the need and urgency for responsible energy usage and energy efficient solutions.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Expert Interview: Vinayak Thorat on Green Buildings (Part II)

In the previous newsletter we talked to Vinayak Thorat on evolution and current market scenario of Green Buildings. In this issue, we discuss with him the key success factors and future outlook for Green building projects.In this issue, we also speak to Amarnath Ekbote, Head of Services at V A Group on Electrical Systems in green buildings.

Continued from Part I

What are the key success factors for a Green Building Project?

First and most important, the client has to drive the project. For example, in case of Kirloskar Brothers Ltd., Mr. Sanjay Kirloskar, Managing Director gave a clear mandate for a green building. Although, he did not have any targets in mind, there was a clear commitment to lead the way in being green.

Second, the architect has to translate the vision for a green building to be understood and implemented by a consortium. We have a group of consultants who closely work with us in electrical, plumbing, air conditioning, landscape and other important areas. Third and probably most critical link in any Green Building project is contractor who actually executes the work. The last man on the site has to be sensitized towards the importance of tiny aspects critical to green building.

Finally, the supplier who provides products also has to be aligned to the objectives of green building and practical difficulties in implementing the same. A holistic and synchronized team is key to successful Green building project.

In the initial days of the KBL project in 2006, we had to orient consultants, contractors, suppliers for the importance of their responsibility in making the project a success. We had to conduct targeted training programs to raise their awareness and sensitize them for norms in Green buildings.

The IGBC (Indian Green Building Council) norms or set of guidelines – Site selection, Water conservation, energy, indoor air quality and innovation helps to structure the vision and implementation practices for Green Building.

Since we are on KBL project, it’s been two years since the project is operational. What advantages are being actually realized?

About the advantages that we promised, I am proud to say, all are realized. More importantly, I would like to talk about the ‘not so obvious’ advantages of the project which were realized by the client. We specifically asked the client about advantages they realized, in addition to energy savings. The feedback is very interesting and thought provoking.

After shifting to the new building the attrition rates have dropped by 6-7%. Employees taking an off from work due to health reasons is also down as compared to that in the past. This can be largely attributed to a more natural working environment. While designing the KBL building we have used sky-lights to provide natural light. Over eighty percent of the employees have a view of outside. The air quality is monitored for Co2 levels. In addition to energy savings, all these factors will play a vital role in company’s growth.

According to you, typically, how many people in the market today are interested in Green buildings?

Back in 2006, I would have said very less. But today, every third or fourth person we meet is interested. While all of them may not be interested in full fledged certifications, there is certainly greater awareness and clarity on building a green element in projects.

The general perception is that the Green Buildings are Expensive. What are your comments?

Well, some elements are still very costly. Say, solar panels or a wind energy sources etc. But there are many other elements that come at little or no additional costs. I would say almost 30-40% of energy savings can be brought in without any significant addition to costs. So these could be perpetual passive means of savings for any building.

In fact, these non-expensive tools like high energy star rating products, rain water harvesting etc. are easier to implement at a smaller scale. For example, there is a huge difference in planning rain water harvesting for a 400 sq. mt. plot for a bunglow against a 4,000 sq. mt plot for commercial complex. The smaller projects are more important than the larger ones for Green buildings to make any significant overall impact on energy consumption.

Can you help to quantify the cost differentials for a green building and a normal building?

This is a very subjective question. Any attempt to quantify these costs can be easily countered. However, as a rule of thumb we can look at the base building cost. The additional costs are dependent on base building costs.

If you consider a base building cost of Rs. 3,000-3,200/ sq. ft. then basic certification can occur without any additional costs. Incremental costs for Silver certification will be about 3-4%, for Gold the costs will be 7-8% extra. Platinum certifications can add 15-18% to the budget of the base building costs mentioned above.

What was the toughest decision in KBL project?

Since 60-65% of power costs are due to HVAC, we wanted to have the best possible technology. Thanks to our consultants we could identify VRV water cooled technology. But there was only one supplier (Daiken), the price was 20-25% higher than regular central chiller systems and virtually no live projects with this technology in India. But the client stood by us and today the HVAC system for this project consumes less than 50% of the total power.

Is it possible to convert an existing building to Green building?

Yes. We as a company have not retrofitted any building yet. But a good example would be KPIT Cummins where we have used VRV Air cooled technology and the building has also won an award. One limitation for existing buildings is that the changes are possible mostly on the front-end. Like for example, you cannot change the plumbing systems but switching to efficient taps with sensors is not a lot of extra cost.

Amarnath Ekbote, Head of Services at V A Group shares his thoughts on Electrical Systems in Green Buildings.

How can modifications in existing electrical systems help to save energy?

Incremental improvements in existing electrical systems can help to achieve significant energy savings. There are two areas where energy savings can be achieved – Lighting and HVAC. For commercial buildings, lighting constitutes to about 10-15% of the total electricity consumption. There are multiple levels on which one can think of improving your current lighting system.

First, at design level where you can modify the design to avoid excess lighting or light pollution. Lighting needs can be accurately calculated using daylight simulation software or lighting designing software. Second opportunity lies in more efficient technology – retrofit existing incandescent, fluorescent tube lights or metal halide lights with T5, CFL or LEDs.

On the next level we can use tools like occupancy based light switching. Use of corridor sensors in lighting can also help to reduce wasteful lighting needs. Significant savings to the tune of 15% to 20% of total lighting power consumption can be achieved through integration of all these efforts on multiple levels.

Given the fact that any attempt to temper with HVAC installation can be costly, how can one save on power consumption in HVAC?

Well, there are many things that can be done on HVAC system which will start from the selection of type & technology of HVAC system followed by other means & extent of automation, selection of highly efficient equipments etc.  As far as possible VFD driven Pumps & Motors should be selected for energy savings. Various options of Heat Recovery can be thought of to have up front Power savings & down-sizing the equipment capacity. The next level of energy saving can be achieved by having individual temperature controls,  use of VAV box, proper zoning based on building functionality etc.

The regular maintenance of plant & equipments will improve the performance over a time span & can offer indirect savings.  One can achieve power saving in between 10% to 25% based on the extent of application of above methods.

Posted in Experts@e-power, GreenCabinet@e-power | Leave a comment

Expert Interview: Vinayak Thorat on Green Buildings (Part I)

In this issue of e-power we speak to Vinayak Thorat, Associate Architect – Head Western Region,Venkataramanan Associates and an expert in the field of Green Buildings.

His team has designed ‘Yamuna’, the corporate office and facility of Kirloskar Brothers Ltd (KBL), which was awarded the prestigious LEED Platinum rating for green buildings. Spread over 3 acres of land the building is able to save up to 30% of energy and 30% of water purely by use of technology and effective design.

Vinayak Thorat shares his thoughts on what it takes to create a green building, the current industry scenario and his experiences from the Kirloskar Brothers Ltd. ‘Yamuna’ project.

What are the various schools of thought in Green Building?

In India we have a diverse and rich tradition in ‘Building Design’. In the Indian context, climatological aspects have always been at the core of building design.

For example, if you take Pune region, with temperatures touching 40 deg cel. it is predominantly a hot climate. The traditional ‘Vaada’ has thick walls that prevent heat penetration. The use of stones, with a high thermal mass, in construction further helps to keep away the heat. The plans of the old buildings are inward looking and hence almost entirely block the hot air coming from outside.

Typically, there is always a well at the center of the house. In addition to being a source of water for drinking and domestic use, the well, also provides cooling effect inside the house.

Similarly, in north India one often finds use of empty earthen pots between slabs in the old Haveli. The pots act as natural heat absorbents insulating the space below.

Moving on from tradition to current times, we have had great practitioners in India like Laurry Baker and B V Joshi. Their work has revived the links available in traditional building design.

How is the current construction industry scenario in view of green building philosophy?

Unfortunately, the mainstream market is driven by commercial compulsions like optimizing FSI, scarce land availability etc. which cannot be ignored. For example, there is an increasing tendency to reduce the thickness of walls in order to increase the carpet area. But with thin walls the heat penetration is faster, more intense and people have to deploy artificial means of cooling like air conditioning.

In the good old days Architecture comprised 80% of the work with the rest taken care by services. Today the situation is exact opposite with Architecture comprising only 20%-30% of the total work and costs while utilities grabbing a majority share of about 60-70% of the total costs.

As we take up large scale, complex projects the list of requirements in utilities like air conditioners, elevators, pumping systems etc. is expanding rapidly.   The result is Energy Intensive buildings. Today, almost every organization needs computers which in turn demand the sensitivity of the building to utilities. So how we co-relate energy efficient design philosophy as well as the engineering aspects is critical for future of green buildings.

How do you see the market for Green Buildings in current industry?

The target audience for green buildings is mostly the corporate sector. Unfortunately the concept has not penetrated to the masses yet. In case of residential projects, customer typically comes in towards the end of planning and construction and hence can influence only cosmetic changes. Also, the developer builder has to keep the overheads low in order to stay competitive. So the use of equipments with higher upfront costs but lower operational costs is still limited in residential projects. The overall focus is still largely on maximizing carpet area.

Since corporate are themselves the end users, requirements can be understood and mapped more accurately. There is willingness for greater initial investments in view of long term cost savings and benefits. Most of the companies design their buildings on institution level and hence are less sensitive to commercial compulsions like achieving target FSI.

Is Green Buildings philosophy really practiced as science or is it just another marketing gimmick?

After architecting seven green buildings, I have come to believe that those who have the ‘intent’ definitely succeed. People using it as marketing gimmick will encounter severe limitations with increasing awareness on green buildings amongst customers.

But as a consumer I am exposed to marketing. How do I see ‘intent’?

Intent is visible in everything you do. The problem is we don’t observe and get carried away by marketing.

See our office, for example, the building depth is designed to ease penetration of natural lighting. The electrical lights have sensors, if I am not there in this room for more than three minutes the lights will go off. The walls are made of Fly ash bricks which have better insulation, higher efficiencies in construction and environment friendly. People love to work and live in an environment that has natural light, a vision of outside surrounded with trees. All these factors in our design clearly express our intent and commitment to green buildings.

To be continued in next issue of e-power….

Download
- Kirloskar Brothers Ltd.

 

Posted in Experts@e-power, GreenCabinet@e-power | Leave a comment